Tag Archives: shared waste bins

LCCC August 2021 minutes

Minutes of Leith Central Community Council ordinary meeting, held via MS Teams, on Monday 16 August 2021 at 7:00pm

Actions and decisions are red italic. nem con means that no-one spoke or voted against a decision.

1 Welcome, introductions, attendance, apologies

1.a Attendance

  • LCCC voting members: Jack Caldwell, Charlotte Encombe , Sheila Kennedy, Ian Mowat,
Harald Tobermann, Lucy Watters
  • LCCC ex-officio or non-voting members: Bruce Ryan (minutes secretary), Cllr Rob Munn, Susan Rae (both Leith Walk ward)
  • Others: Alan McIntosh (Broughton Spurtle), ~5 residents and visitors

1.b Apologies

  • Alan Dudley (LCCC), Pierre Forissier, Nick Gardner (LCCC), Cllr Amy McNeese-Mechan (Leith Walk ward)

1.c to note: declarations of interest in any items on the agenda

none

1.d to agree: order of business below

agreed nem con

2 Approval of minutes of the ordinary LCCC meeting on 17 May 2021

  • Approved as-is (proposed J Caldwell, seconded C Encombe, nem con)
  • Action: June AGM minutes to be considered for accuracy in September meeting, even if this isn’t a formal approval

3 Matters arising from previous minutes (and not included on agenda below)

  • Item 4.a.iv (pinch-point on Annandale St): J Caldwell has engaged with Trams team on this
  • Item 11.a archaeology: C Encombe has notified CEC archaeologist that LCCC would like to hear more on recent findings.

4 Policing Matters

4.a to note: Community Police Officer’s Update

no police representative, no report

  • Lack of police attendance for nearly 2 years was noted, yet police at least submit reports to other CCs
  • S Kennedy: an Edina St resident has reported antisocial behaviour to the police, but has had no response.
  • A resident: I have regular contact with a Newhaven-based police officer, who is responsive.
  • Actions: resident and J Caldwell to forward police contact details to S Kennedy; SK to ask for at least a written report.

4.b to note: CEC’s award of contracts for IP video surveillance system and fibre network (F&R Committee, 12 August 2012)

Action: LCCC members to read documentation, then decide whether to discuss this further

5 Transport & Clean Streets

5.a to note: consultation on Edinburgh’s Proposed Low Emission Zone (deadline 20-09-21)

Action: LCCC members to read documentation

5.b to note: damage to road surface at Leopold Place due to diverted bus (prompted by tram works) – Leopold Place Residents

  • A resident: I have been working with H Tobermann and NTBCC on this matter, which is causing much vibration to nearby buildings. We believe that vibration has been increased by tram-related traffic diversions, but this is not being considered seriously. How can this be resolved?
  • Resident: we are on the boundary between CEC wards: the road is in City Centre ward, so we have contacted Cllrs Miller and Doran.
  • H Tobermann: the resident’s house is in LCCC’s area yet the road is in NTBCC’s area. Also, neither the Tram Team (TT) nor CEC roads recognize this issue as their responsibility. Someone needs to own this problem.
  • J Caldwell: Bellevue and Annandale residents have worked together on similar issues. I can put you in contact.
  • Cllr Rae: these issues are widespread throughout our ward. We should work with TT on the general problem.
  • Action: Cllrs Rae and Munn to pursue this with other relevant cllrs, CEC roads officers and trams team

5.c Trams to Newhaven

5.c.i to note: Tram Team’s proposals for much narrower pavements on Leith Walk, with c. 250m not meeting minimum in Edinburgh Street Design Guidance (ESDG)

  • H Tobermann: giving space to public transport (i.e. trams) is understandable, as are car-, bus- and cycle-traffic. However, this narrowing does not seem right. It has only emerged this fortnight. Living Streets is pushing hard on this. Large-scale drawings have been available for some time, but these did not give enough detail to become aware of this issue. The table in the link was compiled by TT recently.
  • There was some discussion/clarification of ESDG minima, and provision of cycle-paths.
  • A resident: space is needed for walking, as we have been encouraged to do, social distancing, prams, wheelchairs etc. If cafes are going to have tables and chairs on pavements, pavements need to be widened.
  • Action: CCTT to push this hard at this week’s CCTT/TT meeting

5.c.ii to note: any issues that have arisen for local residents or businesses that have not been dealt with satisfactorily by the Tram Project Team

  • A resident: the tram route does not benefit and is not accessible to anyone not on its route, yet all residents pay for it.
  • H Tobermann: no. According to the business case, it will be paid for from future revenue.

5.d to note: any other Transport & Clean Street matters relevant to LCCC area

5.d.i Controlled parking zones

  • I Mowat: I learnt today that the next CEC transport and environment committee (TEC) meeting will consider approval of report receommending roll-out of phase 2 controlled parking zones (CPZs). In LCCC’s area, this includes Bonnington and West Leith. For Bonnington, on which LCCC commented, it is recommended to proceed. If would need to register any deputation on this tomorrow. There is some amelioration of concerns about Connaught Place. There is no recommendation for mews parking, despite residents strongly desiring this. There is no acknowledgement of LCCC’s representation – can local councilors reiterate it at the TEC meeting? It would be better if this decision was delayed another month so that residents have time to react to the report.
  • Cllr Munn: these are good points. I have also commented on Connaught Place proposals, and raised other residents’ issues. LCCC’s submission has been acknowledged by CEC officers. Although I am not on TEC, I have met with its convenor today to raise issues. I can reiterate LCCC’s position to the TEC convenor.
  • Action: IM to send LCCC’s submission to Cllr Munn
  • S Kennedy: detailed plans for phase 1 are not yet available. Abbeyhill residents have also requested mews parking, but have received no response, and there is no information about this on CEC’s website. What are the regulations on mews parking? Do we need to wait for TROs for phase 1 to see the proposals? There has been better consultation about phase 2. We have also not seen bin-hub proposals – is it too late to request changes?
  • Cllr Rae/I Mowat: only residents who have permits can parking in mews-parking areas. There are no permits for visitors. See https://consultprojectcentre.co.uk/parkingph3/widgets/20451/faqs#question6619.

5.d.ii Proposed on-street bin-hubs

  • J Caldwell: CEC is consulting on a communal bin-review. Proposals for some areas have not yet been published, but people should watch this link.
  • S Kennedy: there has only been a tiny notice in Abbeyhill about bin-changes, but details were promised. There are no
  • C Encombe: bins, parking etc should be considered together.

5.d.iii Leopold Place and nearby bus-stops

  • A resident: The Trams TRO implies removal of one of Leopold Place’s two bus-stops. A temporary bus-stop on lower Leopold Place has been tolerated by residents, who are concerned that the stop may be made permanent. How can suitable detail be obtained, and/or a deputation made?
  • A resident: A bus-stop is preventing visibility of oncoming traffic at the Windsor St/London Rd junction. Tram-work has worsened this problem.
  • Action: Cllrs Munn and Rae, which will continue after completion of tram-works, to raise these issues with CEC officers.

5.d.iv Just Eat hire-bikes and shelters for other bikes

  • A resident: Just Eat hire-bike racks are empty and derelict, so do they have a point?
  • C Encombe: it may be that bikes are simply elsewhere.
  • J Caldwell: Just Eat bikes do not lock into racks, but are tracked by GPS. There was a problem with vandalism of racks. New racks – and dumped bikes – are now a trip-hazard.
  • A resident: my street needs a shelter for parking private bikes, to avoid fire-hazards from bikes parked on stairs.
  • J Caldwell: there is a plan to increase numbers of these shelters. I suggest contacting your local councillors.

6 LCCC Governance

6.a to agree: to resume future LCCC meetings at the Nelson Hall

  • C Encombe: it is likely that LCCC can stream its meetings but not undertake online question sessions
  • Action: B Ryan to report on his forthcoming experiences with hybrid CC meetings
  • Action: B Ryan, J Caldwell, S Kennedy to experiment with streaming
  • Decision: resumption was agreed (5 for, 1 against)
  • It was later found that Nelson Hall will not be available for the foreseeable future.

6.b to note: update on handover of Teams admin

  • J Caldwell: there have been no major challenges or bad behaviour so far. 2-factor authentication, passwords etc are appropriately available but safeguarded. Face-to-face meetings may imply less reliance on Teams.
  • H Tobermann: J Caldwell, I and B Ryan have access to an online table of passwords etc. Members need to trust us.
  • A resident: masks impede lip-reading.
  • S Kennedy: transparent masks are of little help.

6.c to note: update on LCCC’s emerging communications protocol

Action: B Ryan to circulate current draft to all members for comment

6.d to note: response from Andrew Kerr regarding LCCC ex officio member and CEC ward councillor Lewis Ritchie

  • H Tobermann/C Encombe: LCCC has effectively lost one of its 4 councillors
  • Action: H Tobermann to complain to local government ombudsman about Cllr Ritchie’s behaviour

6.e to note: update on LCCC’s ex officio membership following recent Scottish parliamentary elections

  • S Kennedy: I have emailed all our representatives, receiving thanks from most

6.f to note: arrangements for LCCC participation in Leith for Ever Event 18 Sep 2021

  • C Encombe: I have only received one offer of help from members. More are needed. We should have a flyer.
  • I Mowat: LCCC should share a pitch with neighbouring CCs.
  • Action: J Caldwell, C Encombe to organise creation of an up-to-date flyer.
  • Action: C Encombe to contact neighbouring CCs about sharing a pitch.

7 Planning

7.a to note: 21/03828/FUL | Erection of 1.5 storey 4-bedroom dwelling house. | Land South Of 1 St

  • C Encombe: LCCC planning is minded to object to this application.
  • I Mowat: while there may be good reasons to object, the plans look reasonable. What value does this green space have? It might be better used for a house and a well-tended garden. Can it be accessed and used well? The proposed house is what LCCC should encourage.
  • H Tobermann: we have the most densely populated area in Scotland, so such green pockets are valuable and part of the area’s original design. The planned house would interfere with neighboring houses’ views. It helps with noise issues. How it is currently used isn’t material – it could be looked after.
  • C Encombe: tenement-dwellers may well appreciate such spaces. Building on brownfield sites should be encouraged over building on green spaces.
  • Lucy Watters: this ‘scrappy’ area could be better used. Green areas help with temperature and biodiversity.

7.b to agree: LCCC enforcement request regarding Pilrig Conservation Area infringement at 4 Arthur Street

H Tobermann: the owner has removed the front garden wall to enable more parking. This contravenes conservation rules.

  • Action: H Tobermann to submit request

7.c to note: 21/03965/FUL | Conversion and extension of building Existing garage Class 5 for Class 4 Business Office Light Industry | 27A Arthur Street EH6 5DA (deadline 27 August 2021)

  • H Tobermann: LCCC planning is minded to object because this would involve demolition of the existing garage. This would of itself be acceptable but it relies on a controversial planning application that LCCC has opposed. If 21/03965/FUL was approved, it would lead to the same access and safety problems as the one LCCC has already opposed.
  • I Mowat: the height and massing seem to be appropriate. (H Tobemann concurred.)

7.d to note: latest update of Edinburgh Local Development Plan: Action Programme 2021

  • H Tobermann: among other things, this programme would mandate developers’ contributions being spent locally.
  • Actions: LCCC members to read this in detail; LCCC planning to report its position on details in this programme

7.e to note: any other planning matters relevant to LCCC area

none

8 Parks & Green Spaces

8.a Powderhall NW-SE Green Corridor

8.a.i to note: further delays (since May) to long overdue Stage 1 report due to ‘[staff being under] intense pressure (not just from temporary schemes) and have also been impacted by Covid related absence’

  • H Tobermann: a relevant report was published a year ago, but the officer who should forward it to TEC has been abstracted to Spaces for People for a long time. CEC should concentrate on core, already agreed, desired matters such as this, which potentially would benefit 30,000 people.
  • I Mowat: the best use for this corridor would be a railway, with a station at Powderhall, as part of a revived Edinburgh rail network. Is this now feasible?
  • J Caldwell: Lack of maintenance by Network Rail of the bridge between Dryden St and McDonald Rd is unwelcome.
  • Cllr Rae: Lack of progress is indeed unwelcome. The very recent IPCC report is terrifying, and should be part of decisions on cars, houses, land-use.
  • C Encombe: many people do want reduced car-numbers. LCCC wants this corridor to be used for sustainable transport

8.a.ii to agree: to write to ward and TEC councillors, requesting resources and TEC prioritisation commensurate with the needs of our densely populated area to have access to green spaces and the North Edinburgh off-road cycle path network

8.b to note: any other Parks & Green Spaces matters relevant to LCCC area

  • S Kennedy: information on Friends of Montgomery Street Park’s plan to revamp the park would be welcome.

9 Open Forum (local residents)[1]

  • All matters discussed at this point were transport matters, so are reported at in items 5.d.ii, 5.d.iii and 5.d.iv

10 AOCB (LCCC members)[2]

  • I Mowat: LCCC’s annual grant (£1049·06) was received in July.

11 Bulletin[3]

11.a Parking: Use of Maximum Standards (Essential Evidence No.42, published August 2021 by Edinburgh Napier University’s Transport Research Institute)

Action: LCCC members to read this report.

12 Future Ordinary Meetings (usually 3rd Monday of the month) and meeting topics/presentations

12.a to note: future meetings on 3rd Monday of each month at 7pm (except July and December)

12.a.i 2021: 20 September, 18 October, 15 November; 2022: 17 January, 21 February, 21 March, 18 April, 16 May (AGM)

  • See also item 6.a above.
  • Action: LCCC members to note these dates
  • Action: LCCC web-team to advertise these meetings as ‘hopefully’ being at the Nelson Hall.
  • Action: C Encombe to ascertain availability of Nelson Hall for these meetings

12.b to note: future presentations and charrettes

12.b.i to agree: to invite Steve Kerr (chair EACC) and Simon Holledge (secretary EACC) for a talk and Q&A on the Future of Community Councils In Edinburgh

  • Decision: this was agreed nem con

[1] This agenda point allows members of the public to raise issues of public interest.

[2] This agenda point allows LCCC members to raise issues not covered by the agenda

[3] Items of local interest that may be raised at a future LCCC meeting – not for discussion at this meeting

LCCC May 2021 minutes

Minutes of Leith Central Community Council ordinary meeting, held via
MS Teams, on Monday 17 May 2021 at 7:00pm Continue reading

Communal bin hubs coming in November

The below was an email sent from the City of Edinburgh Council regarding the new bin hubs (a new approach to shared waste and recycling bins) and controlled parking.

Plans for Bonnington have been published on the Council website (https://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/bins-recycling/communal-bin-review/4?documentId=12997&categoryId=20001), with Leith Walk and Pirlig coming at a later date.

What’s happening?

For on street locations, we are working in conjunction with parking to minimise the disruption to each street, by timing our changes alongside traffic regulation changes.

Leith, North Leith, Leith Walk, Pilrig and Abbeyhill areas will be subject to a Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) process which is taking place in summer 2021 as part of the Strategic Review of Parking. Residents will be able to provide feedback on the plans, including the on-street bin locations, through the TRO process, when available.

For other areas in Phase 1, which will not be subject to a TRO, which includes Bonnington, West Leith, Easter Road, Willowbrae North, Craigentinny and north of Restalrig, we will advise residents that the bin hubs are coming in advance, to allow them to feedback on the locations.

To do this, we will display posters on lampposts in the affected areas and advise local community councils and other stakeholders. Residents will be able to view the plans online from week commencing 26 July and provide feedback by 22 August 2021. The bin hub webpages will explain how to do this.

The feedback received from residents from both the TRO process and the engagement process by September will allow enough time to confirm the final locations and make any changes if required and start the roll out of the new bin hubs starting in November 2021.

Feedback will be considered where this can be delivered in conjunction with the fulfilment of the parameters and criteria as set out in the committee report.

When works are about to start on a street, we will send a postcard to let residents know.

We will then write to all residents to explain what is happening and to encourage them to recycle. A guide with information about how to reduce, reuse and recycle will be included in the letter.

Community Councils Together on Trams/Trams Team meeting, 25 February 2021

Minutes of the Community Councils Together on Trams/Trams Team meeting
(Construction Phase) via Google Meet on Thursday 25 February 2021 at 5:30pm Continue reading

Trams to Newhaven Newsletter: 2nd July

The Trams to Newhaven team have published their latest newsletter which details the Leith Walk roadworks, new bins arrangements and an incoming cycle-lane. We have posted the Leith Central-related plaintext below but you can sign up for the alerts directly by going to edinburgh.gov.uk/tramstonewhaven

Leith Walk
The establishment of the construction site from London Road to Crown Place is ongoing. The city bound lane is operational. Please visit our project website for further information on the traffic management arrangements. Details of Lothian Bus diversions are available on their website

Site Investigation works have commenced from London Road to Annandale Street and will be continuing down Leith Walk.  

The junction of McDonald Road and Leith Walk will be closed from 10th July for 6 weeks to undertake utility works in this area. 

Bins
Communal bins for Leith Walk are now situated at the nearest side street to their existing location. The regularity of uplifts will be increased to ensure the area is kept clean and tidy and uplifts will take place in the evening to minimise traffic in the area at peak times. If a bin collection has been missed please report this on the council’s website. 

Cycle Way on Leith Walk  
We are installing a bi-directional cycle lane as part of the establishment of the construction site. This will result in a separate cycle way for cyclists adjacent to the pedestrian footpath and both will be maintained throughout the period of construction. We are aware of concerns raised by residents and members of the public and as an interim arrangement we have installed advisory signs. In the meantime, we would ask that all cyclists approach the area with caution. 

Parking
All parking and loading provisions are suspended on Constitution Street and between Foot of the Walk to London Road with no street parking or loading facilities available on the running lane on Leith Walk. Parking areas will be provided at three locations during the works to facilitate access to businesses and local properties. These parking facilities will be short stay only for 30 mins and will be located in the vicinity of Crown Street, Pilrig Street and Elm Row.

COVID-19 Measures
Following the outbreak of COVID19 we have implemented strict measures to ensure that optimum safety is achieved for our staff and the general public.  We have uploaded a short video to share our new controls.  All works must now be carried out in compliance with Scottish Government guidance.  We have implemented the following protocols

  • All staff and operatives have now been re-inducted to communicate the projects COVID 19 measures. These are followed up with regular briefings to ensure the message is continually communicated and to reiterate the importance of good hygiene and physical distancing requirements.
  • Work will be carried out in compliance with Scottish Government guidance however workers will also be provided with additional Personal Protective Equipment when required
  • Temperature testing is now mandatory on the project and all staff, visitors and operatives are subject to a daily temperature check when presenting at site.
  • All sites will have infection control station, shown in the photo above. These stations are available to our operatives whilst out on site to promote good hygiene practice.
  • The project site office has been remodelled to include measures for physical distancing and optimum hygiene measures. Anyone entering the project office is re-inducted and advised of the above measures in order to prevent spread of COVID19. Those who can work from home are required to continue to do so.

In order to allow for physical distancing, pedestrian footways across the route will be widened where it is safe to do so. There are several sections of the footway where this will not be possible due to open excavations and/or uneven surfacing. To address this, we are installing suggested one-way systems on several sections and introducing passing places where possible.  We are continuing to review our working areas and liaising with council colleagues to ensure that we implement best practice but in the meantime in areas where space is restricted, as in other parts of the city, we would ask that people consider other pedestrians and give them space, stay alert especially if you are using your phone or wearing headphones, and keep left if possible and pass on the right.

Logistics Hubs
The logistics hubs on Mitchell Street, Foot of the Walk, Dalmeny Street, Albert Street and Montgomery Street are now operational. Logistic officers are working within the physical distancing guidelines outlined by the Scottish Government. The logistic hubs are there to help businesses with deliveries and dispatches but any resident on the construction route that is expecting a bulky delivery should contact the logistic hub who will be able to assist. 
We have received positive feedback about our Logistic Officer’s practice and would encourage anyone who requires support to make contact with them.